Posts Tagged ‘Recreation’

Economics of Fuel Surcharges

June 2nd, 2010
I took this photo of a Southwest Airlines Jet ...
Image via Wikipedia

This summer,  I will be traveling to Bulgaria for a few weeks to enjoy the Mediterranean with my girlfriend. We’ve been looking at ticket prices over the last few months, and they’ve been incredibly high. I’ve started looking into why this might be and have come across two reasons.

First, airlines are cutting back capacity; some voluntarily, while others due to strikes. The recession meant cutting back everywhere, and now that demand is jumping, airlines are just happy to have planes packed again. Increased demand with decreased supply equals price increases.

Secondly, airlines have enacted costly fees. In my opinion, these fees are a scam, and are actually hidden from the consumer and labeled as “taxes”. In many cases the fees are almost as much as the flight itself! Let’s have a look:

  1. “Peak Travel Fees” – An extra $30 fee for tickets through Labor Day.
  2. “Fuel Surcharges” – In some cases $100-200 extra per flight for the cost of fuel.

Wait a second, isn’t fuel included in the price of a ticket? I’m certainly not paying for the comfort of stuffing my 6′3″ body into a coach seat, and I would think that the cost of transportation is included in the cost of a ticket. In reality, a fuel “surcharge” should really only apply if you buy your ticket and then after you purchase the ticket the price of fuel skyrockets….in which case, why hasn’t the airline hedged this risk by buying oil futures/options? Or are airlines forgetting that fuel makes up 30% of their operating expense  (look at the 10-k for Southwest if you’re curious) and planning for cost variations is encouraged.

But lets assume that this is expected for a second and that this fuel surcharge includes the FULL price of fuel, how much would  a passenger flying to Sofia expect to pay?

According to TravelMath, the flight to Sofia is just over 4,500 miles.  How Stuff Works estimates that an international flight burns .01 gallons of fuel per mile per person. Lastly, the spot price of jet fuel from the IATA is $2.04 per gallon.

Multiply all of this together and you get $92.50.

Thus, when you take into account the 4 legs of my round trip flight, you get 4 x $30 (for the summer peak fee) and 2 x $92.50 for the fuel fees which equals $305. And indeed, thats about where most of the flights fees are. Granted, most of this is hidden from view, so it’s just an estimate…but it all feels very sneaky to me.

So why does this occur? Flyers are INCREDIBLY price sensitive. Airlines used to offer all sorts of perks from gourmet meals to legroom to juggling midgets for entertainment. But when it comes down to brass tacks, people buy based on price. Allowing these fees encourages airlines to lower ticket prices for advertising and marketing purposes (only $300 to get to Europe! <tiny font> just pay $900 in fees! </tiny font>). And indeed, when you look at the varying prices the “cheapest ticket” is $787 with $490 in fees and the most expensive ticket is $1,179 with $160 in fees.  All told, there’s only $60 difference between the two.

Alternatively, during the fuel scare a few years back many airlines bought long term hedges on oil that allowed them to lock in a certain price on fuel. A few, such as Southwest, were smart and made a killing. Many, such as United, lost millions upon millions of dollars when the price of oil dropped.  I haven’t looked into this in any depth, but its possible that the airlines are locked into these bad contracts and the surcharge just makes whole any difference between the spot price of oil and the exorbitantly high price of oil the airlines paid for it.

My last throwaway hypothesis, and my most diabolical thought, is that these fees allow airlines to collude on prices while still looking competitive. “My price is $787 and my competitors price is $1,179!!”  Both airlines have almost identical total costs while still arguing perfect competition.

What do you guys think? Will competition erode these excess fees?

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Why haven’t we seen the morning half day pass?

February 1st, 2010

I just spent this past weekend snowboarding in Vermont at the Pico Resort. It’s a quaint mountain, but nice for an intermediate or beginner rider. Certainly no match for the neighboring Killington Resort, but for what it lacks in size, it makes up for in lack of crowds. I don’t think I waited in line for more than 30 seconds at the busiest of times, and I never had to worry about crowds on the slopes getting in everyone’s way.

It was a fairly relaxing getaway despite the subzero temperatures (thank you layering) and a few roommates who were determined to destroy the place by body slamming the bunk bed (then consequently blaming the bed construction when it cracked), knocking the dustbuster from the wall, smoking cigars in the kitchen and wearing ski boots on the hardwood floors.  Luckily, the Pico Frathouse was more or less returned to it’s original condition upon departure.

I did have a few thoughts on our 3 hour drive back home:

1) Thank goodness for helmets, which almost certainly prevented my girlfriend from a concussion (a nasty fall at the end of our second day).

&

2) Why don’t ski resorts offer a Sunday half day pass that begins in the morning? I think one of the reasons that Pico was so undercrowded is that it offers no comparative advantage to the Killington resort. Killington is larger, has better conditions, more interesting terrain, and an earlier half day (starts at 11:45am instead of 12:30pm at Pico). There are also many people who refuse to wait until 12:30 when they have to make a 3-5 hour trek back home, so choose to head home earlier. If a morning pass was offered, I think many people would ski from 10 to 12:30 instead of forgoing skiing on Sunday. It’s also not a question of gaming the system or cheating since the ski lift operators scan your pass every time you use the lift and would catch freeloaders easily.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]